Our crisis moment...

My generation finally got our war, and we got our depression, but will we and our Gen Z children have it affect us the way that it did previous generations? Who will be most defined by this crisis? 

My parents were too old to be baby boomers, they're part of what's known as "The Silent Generation," the people who were the parents or Aunts and Uncles of the the Baby Boomers or Gen-Xers. My brother and I are both X-ers with him being right on the X/Boomer Line. After my generation came Y (Millennials), then Z (The Net Generation).

I want to talk about X-ers and Zs. The former because that's who I am, and the Zs because those are the kid's I'll be teaching. X-ers are what are referred to as a "baby bust" generation where the birth rate compared to the previous generation is much lower. We're supposed to be cynical, self-directed and the first truly postmodern generation. We're reflections of the Lost Generation after World War I. The Zs are similar to my generation in many ways (after all, they are our children) they are similar to my parents, sometimes referred to as a new Silent Generation, a generation that is less team oriented (boomerish) and more individualistic. That they will concentrate less on big ideas and more on what they can accomplish. Lastly, Zs are supposed to be less concerned with fitting into a group, and more into acceptance of the other.

As a student of history, I am finding many parallels with previous generations. The Lost Generation (the X-ers of the early 20th century) gave birth to the Silent Generation (the Zs of the mid-20th century.) The Lost Generation lived through a war and depression, but weren't active participants in either. Having thought about this, I realize now, that I will be teaching the 21st century's equivalent of my own parents!

But the thrust of this message gets to the heart of what defines a generation? My generation didn't really have a war, we didn't have the idealism like the Boomers. We had everything and felt like nothing. The world could end at any moment, but we felt a void. X. X, signifying nothing. And Z, the new Silent Generation. The children who will turn back to family and concentrating on getting by and getting back to basics.

Who will step up to the plate and advocate for strengthening our country, improving our schools, rebuilding our infrastructure and solving the larger problems? If history has any guide, it won't be Gen-X, and it Won't be Gen-Z, but those in-between. The youth who believe that they can do everything. But the question is, will they eventually become the same disillusioned people their parents, the Boomers are if they don't accomplish everything they think they can.

In the end, what is it better to be. Idealistic and have your hopes dashed? Or better to be realistic and silent, hoping for the best, but planning for the worst? Do we have to make a choice? I choose to be realistic and idealistic.

PPS High School Redesign/Rant

For those who don't know, Portland Public Schools have been losing students for years due to several factors. Whatever the reasons, Portland is has lost well over 20,000 students since the highs of over 80,000 students early sixties. While the population of Oregon is growing, PPS is shrinking. It is because of this that PPS has been engaged in a prolonged and sometimes contentious high school redesign. There were many ideas, but most of them involved the closing of high schools. This new one is no different, with the exception that only one school would be closing.

It's unfortunate, but PPS seems to be fighting a losing population battle. Unless more parents with families move into the city or there is a local baby boom, it's unlikely that Portland will need the use of all of the large comprehensive high school campuses. But it's difficult to close schools because everyone has input, and there are some schools that need to be closed.

But this isn't a problem that is unique to Portland. School districts across the country are flailing due mostly in the short-term to the economy, but also over the long-term due to demographic changes and structural instability and inability of governments to make the hard funding and hiring decisions.

This speaks to a broader societal problem in general. Our priorities are out of whack. We believe that we can fund everything that we want/need, but we don't want to pay for it. What I say is not controversial. What I write next may be. If we can't decide what we will cut, we must find ways of raising money, and if that means raising taxes, then so be it. If it means cutting services, then let's do that. At least we're paying for what we get. The real danger is going down the path that we are.

I'm happy that there is a new emphasis on education, but it's really hard decision time. Do we pay teachers more as Michell Rhee in Washington DC wants to? (Although studies have shown that more money past a certain point doesn't actually improve job performance or increase happiness). Do we get rid of the failing teachers? (Yes) Do we increase the amount of charter schools? (Jury's out on this)

These questions are the ones that we must decide as a society. Whatever the answer, we better figure it out soon, because we should be able to provide an education to students that is at least as good as it was when I was a student twenty years ago. Otherwise we'll continue to be a second-rate first-world country.

Thoughts on job hunting...

I am very likely going to move.

Oregon, the state where I happen to live, is a beautiful, vibrant, and pleasant place. (It also rains for weeks at a time too, which I love) However, Oregon has a dearth of teaching positions, not only for new teachers, but even experienced ones. The inability of the state to figure out funding, coupled with a sharp decrease in retirements doesn't bode well for my staying in this state. In all likelihood, when I'm hired for a teaching position, it will be outside of Oregon.

Being a native, it might seem that I'd be depressed with the prospect. Rather, this is an exciting proposition. Even though I love my native land, I am quite interested in creating new experiences outside of the Pacific Northwest. I've traveled more this year than I have in probably the previous five years combined. I flew to Washington D.C. where I was able to get an idea of what that part of the country is like, as well as driving to central Kansas to visit my extended family. Being able to see other parts of the west and reacquaint myself with the people and different outlooks on life was fun.

Teaching is a vocation, not just a job. It is my belief that wherever I end up, I will put all of my effort into it, be it a rural, suburban or urban setting. At this point, I have no preference. When I find the right position, I can then concentrate on working for the best interests of the students, no matter where they live, my new home.

Every child deserves a good teacher, and it's my desire to be that teacher. Wherever that may be.

-Darin-